Skip to main content

Medieval Women by Eileen Power: The medieval ages weren't a great time to be a woman

 
I've been eyeing the extremely short Medieval Women by Eileen Power for a few years, and lo, it is finally finished. Eileen Power has her own Wikipedia page and was a general badass who went to Cambridge AND the Sorbonne (in like the 1910s, so, damn), then became Professor of Economic History at the London School of Economics and THEN took that same job at Cambridge. Wikipedia has even MORE awesome information about her, but let's talk about Medieval Women, which is a collection of her lectures published after her death (and aw, was edited by her husband).

Medieval Women clocks in at a scant 99 pages, and has a plethora of medieval ladypics, so you can easily read it in an afternoon. It's split into five chapters, which are:

1. Medieval ideas about women
2. The lady
3. The working woman in town and country
4. The education of women
5. Nunneries

WHY should you care about this? Because first, "the position of women is often considered as a test by which the civilisation of a country or age may be judged," and SECOND:
The medieval theory about women, bequeathed as a legacy to future generations and enshrined alike in law and in literature, was destined to have profound social effects for centuries to follow, long after the forces behind it had ceased to be important and when the conditions which had accounted for it no longer existed.

indeed! excellent point, excellent.

What I've decided upon reading this is that if I could be ANYONE in medieval society, I'd either want to be a merchant's wife, or a nun. Everything else sucked. Although apparently nunneries were not that great, and not that plentiful throughout England. I sort of assumed there were a ton, but between 1250 and 1540, there were only between 126 to 136 nunneries in England, and during those years, only four had over 30 nuns.

During this period (c. 1350) there cannot have been more than 3500 nuns altogether in England, and these numbers were steadily decreasing to 1900 in 1534.
 Crazy, right? But you still got to live with other ladies, have a regimented life (which totally appeals to me), get an education probably, although standards declined in that respect over the centuries, and you got to make fun hand gestures at each other during dinner because no one was allowed to talk but you still had to ask people to pass the fish.

If you married a merchant though, you maybe got educated, because reading would be a plus since you were almost definitely going to be helping him in his trade, you had a more equal lifestyle than fancy ladies did with their husbands, if your husband died you could take over his business, and things just seemed pretty swell compared to the other options. I mean, you'd still probably die by 30, but it was the medieval ages, so I don't know what you were expecting.

I will end on a fun anecdote! Which is that in the early 14th c, there was a lady physician practicing in Paris named Jacqueline Felicie de Almania, who was prosecuted by the medical faculty for practicing without a license. For her defense, she brought in patients who had been given up for lost by other doctors, but whom she cured, AND she said that the law existed to stop "ignorant and foolish persons who know not the art of medicine," whereas she clearly did know it. She said they needed women doctors, because some women were ashamed to "show their infirmities" to a man and some died rather than doing so. She was prohibited from practicing and fined, but "as she had already disregarded a previous prohibition and fine, she probably went on as before."

Hurray Jacqueline Felicie de Almania!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

Yes, Frances Willard was as gay as Oscar Wilde. But in a lady-way.

Yup. We're gonna do it. We're gonna talk about Frances Willard and gayness. Look, it's not a major part of her life, and it's definitely not the main thing she should be remembered for, but the fact that a line is being put out that she was totally straight is complete hogwash and it upsets me.




The thing is, I get when people say it's anachronistic to put the cultural concept of "gayness" onto a person from a century other than the 20th/21st. I get that. And usually agree with it. But Frances Willard is one of the gayest people in history. I have zero problem labeling her with that. The fact that she didn't have the language to describe what she was experiencing is upsetting, but she managed to have a seemingly full and satisfying life anyway, so I am happy for her.

And for people annoyed when gay people say that someone from the past was gay, here's the thing: When you're completely whitewashed from history, it is a matter of TOTAL DELIGHT wh…