Skip to main content

Book Blogger Hop, Pt II

Book Blogger Hop

All right. The question for this week is:

 "Do you read only one book at a time, or do you have several going at once?"

Oh-ho my. I have an issue with book commitment. I start a new book, and it's exciting and fresh, and I get really jazzed about it, and then 20% of the way through, almost without fail, I start getting bored and want to start another book. I once had seven books going at the same time, because I kept getting bored and starting new ones. It's a sickness.

Right now I'm being pretty good and working on The Monk, Northanger Abbey, Kissing the Witch, and I'm about to start Waiting for the Barbarians since my friend lent it to me. But The Monk and NA are basically books I only read when I'm at work, so I don't see it so much as working on four books, as having books in different locales. Yes.

This entry wasn't as good as some of the others, but I shall rally on the morrow. Yes I shall.

Comments

  1. Stopping by on the hop.
    I wish I could read multiple books at one time - I'm a one book at a time kind of girl!

    Books Are Life,
    Heather
    www.booksarelife-vitalibri.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, do not even wish to venture down that path. It is a hazardous one, full of false starts and few endings.

    Wait...maybe it's good for paths not to have ends. Because that'd make it a dead end, right? Wait, no. That's it. I'm giving up on metaphors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Happy Blog Hop!

    I'm so amazed when people can read this many books at once! How in the world do you focus??? LOL

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi,

    Found you through the Hop and now following, too. I've looked through your past posts (oh so interesting!) and I'm really looking forward to reading your future work.

    Feel free to stop by my blog in your spare time, http://www.coffeetalereviews.blogspot.com/

    Take care & happy reading,
    Ms C

    ReplyDelete
  5. I usually have multiple books going at one time, too. I just finished Jane Austen week in my library and the featured book was Northanger Abbey. I like the book and it is relatively easy to read compared to her other books.

    -Anne
    My Head is Full of Books

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess as long as it works for you, who is anyone to judge your reading habits :)

    Here's my Book Blogger Hop: 3/18-3/21 post!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't really like book beginnings. So I'm always more excited when I get into the middle of a book and I understand what I need to. I guess we are opposites.

    www.reflectionsofabookaholic.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Sarah

    I have a short attention span? So really it's very much me NOT focusing. :D

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hopping through. New follower! I find it hard to focus on just one book, like you, and tend to read multiple ones. I really want to read Northhanger Abbey. It's one of the only Austen books I haven't read.
    My Hop

    ReplyDelete
  10. Coming through on the hop.

    I have no problem reading two books at a time though it does not happen often. I generally like to finish one and then start another.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Alison, NA is hilarious. It's a bit rougher than her others since it's her first, but I really like it. Try to read one of the Gothic novels it's making fun of too, if you can.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I read only one book at a time. In fact, I have this weird quirk where I don't start reading a new book unless it's been at least 24 hours since I've read the last one. I don't know why. I guess I like to have time to think about them and letting everything sink in.

    Lol, that sounds as if I were reading Nietzsche and not Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone for the umpteenth time. But one obviously needs enough time to think about Quidditch.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @waterfly89

    that sounds as if I were reading Nietzsche and not Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone for the umpteenth time. But one obviously needs enough time to think about Quidditch.

    Best. comment. ever.

    One totally needs time to think about Quidditch. And I admire the fact that you give yourself time to think about what you've read. I'm way, way too impatient for that.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I read Northanger Abbey followed by Mysteries of Udolpho, and Northanger Abbey, while funny in the first instance, was way awesomer afterward.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I can only read one at a time or I get all mixed up...I am now a follower, Happy reading!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Only one book at a time for me, stop and see mine.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Julie I can't find your blog! Or do you prefer to dwell in secret?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Not everyone can multi-task and nobody should. When it comes to book sure, I can't read four books simultaneously (or even two, for that matter!) but there are times I'll juggle as many as four books at a time depending on the subject matter, the urgency or more often both.

    The real trick to this is what KINDS of books to juggle. Hop on over to my blog and learn the method behind my madness - http://www.howardshermannet
    Howard Sherman
    http://www.howardsherman.net

    ReplyDelete
  19. One-book-at-a-time lady here....

    ....I don't know how folks do it....I am amazed at how many people read more than one book at at time. :)

    Stop by my blog for a giveaway of LINEN QUEEN courtesy of Sarah from Hachette Books and to see my answer to this week's Blog Hop question.

    http://silversolara.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi
    Just hopping by and following through. I can't read multiple books at once, but I read fast enough that boredom isnt really an issue

    Shelleyrae @ Book'd Out
    www.bookdout.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hopping by!

    I read more than one book at a time, sometimes three, sometimes five!

    I read varied genres, have a truly eclectic taste in books. Feel free to explore my blog, browse my reviews. I follow via google reader NOT GFC!

    Here is my Book Blogger Hop/Follow Friday post!

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't have a blog! I 'm not sure why it shows my name as clicky.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Julie Oh it's YOU. I was like 'Who's this person who left the awesome comment? I must follow their blog.'

    But I already know you. And we need to get pie when it gets slightly warmer and you're not going insane from exams.

    ReplyDelete
  24. SORRY TO DISAPPOINT. Yes, pie. I am more or less a Free Woman starting Friday.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

My Cousin Rachel by Daphne Du Maurier: DID SHE OR DIDN'T SHE

Daphne Du Maurier's 1951 My Cousin Rachel prompts the age-old question: what if you were a young dumb dumb with an estate in Cornwall who is convinced your charming, thoughtful, and recently-widowed cousin Rachel wants to abandon her native Italy forever and live with you, your dogs, and your elderly butler in a damp house by the sea. AFTER ALL WHO WOULDN'T.

Also she's a widow because she'd married your uncle who raised you who then recently died, so also this has just become the MOST oedipal and makes everyone feel gross thinking about it.




Said dumb dumb is Philip Ashley, who is 24 and aptly referred to in the recent film version as a "glorious puppy." He is so excited about some things. And so sulky about so many other things. He's our narrator, which here means he is our misogynistic, xenophobic lens through which to view all events. His uncle died in Italy soon after marrying Rachel. Said uncle suspected he was being poisoned. He also probably had a bra…