Skip to main content

Top Ten Tuesday! On a Wednesday!

Minor personal life digression -- I am eating less and working out, in a desperate and possibly futile attempt to combat my life of fatty, delicious foods (especially during the cold, dark months of winter in Chicago). This has caused my body to become something of a tiredness factory, a phrase that might not make sense if you really think about it, but it does to me.

The above to explain why my Top Ten Tuesday is, in fact, being posted on a Wednesday. Why it's five instead of ten is just pure laziness.



Top Five Bookish Pet Peeves

1. Series cliffhangers. If your story’s compelling, I’ll buy your next book. Don’t end it with something like “But – but he can’t be the murderer! Not—“

It's dumb and manipulative. I will stop reading your series immediately.

2. Inaccurate characterizations. When I was a teenager, I read every novel about Elizabeth I that I could find (mainly to see if they had hot Robert Dudley/Elizabeth action). One of them mainly involved her communing with Satan. Just…no.
3. Books written to fulfill an agenda. When this happens, not to get all full of myself, but truth no longer drives the characters. Instead it’s whatever message the author is trying to spread. This is why I stopped reading The Jungle, am not terribly fond of Hard Times (Dickens basically says Utilitarianism is Bad over and over), and haaaaate The Amber Spyglass by Philip Pullman. That wasn’t even written to convey a message; it was written out of anger. I’m not wasting time on someone’s poorly written diatribes.

4. Clouding your meaning in a seemingly impenetrable fog. I’m looking at you, Henry James.

5. It’s not the fault of the author, but when the back of the book gives away 2/3 of the plot. I can’t even look at the backs of books anymore because I’m terrified my will to read it’ll be shot by learning basically everything about it in two seconds.

Comments

  1. Monday I will be joining you in the de-fattying process. Figuratively.

    Also OH MY GOD THANK YOU PHILIP PULLMAN IS THE WORST.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Julie Dude, I can't even talk about it. That book pissed me off so much. If he had said "*insert religion here* is a very powerful and convincing mistake," people would be furious. But because it's Christianity, it's fine.

    And that wasn't even the worst of it! I seem to remember thinking that because he had left Christ out of his 'Argument Against Christianity,' his argument work. But if you added him in, it totally fell apart. Don't remember details.

    Ok, apparently I *can* talk about it. But not without riling myself up. Grrrrr. *shakes fists*

    ReplyDelete
  3. I HAAAATE when the back of the book gives away a huge part of the story. Ooh that irritates me so much! I love that, at least when I review it, I know I can write a better summary for people ;P

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even as a committed atheist, I'm afraid I have to confirm that "The Amber Spyglass" is a total failure, for pretty much exactly this reason. The first two books are wonderful, because they are driven by the story, the characters, and the author's imagination—almost everything in "Amber Spyglass," however, is ham-fisted and didactic. Rather ironic, since Pullman so publicly reviled Lewis for the same thing in "The Last Battle," another didactic and ideology-driven novel; in both cases, I'm happy to remove the offending book from my radar, but Pullman's books suffer the more for not having an ending, while Narnia's episodic format never required one.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

Yes, Frances Willard was as gay as Oscar Wilde. But in a lady-way.

Yup. We're gonna do it. We're gonna talk about Frances Willard and gayness. Look, it's not a major part of her life, and it's definitely not the main thing she should be remembered for, but the fact that a line is being put out that she was totally straight is complete hogwash and it upsets me.




The thing is, I get when people say it's anachronistic to put the cultural concept of "gayness" onto a person from a century other than the 20th/21st. I get that. And usually agree with it. But Frances Willard is one of the gayest people in history. I have zero problem labeling her with that. The fact that she didn't have the language to describe what she was experiencing is upsetting, but she managed to have a seemingly full and satisfying life anyway, so I am happy for her.

And for people annoyed when gay people say that someone from the past was gay, here's the thing: When you're completely whitewashed from history, it is a matter of TOTAL DELIGHT wh…