Skip to main content

The Uprising of the 20,000: New York and the 1909 Shirtwaist Strike

"An equal number of men never would hold together under what these girls are enduring."

You know what gets all the attention? The Triangle Factory fire. Which is understandable, because it was a massive public tragedy that improved New York's fire codes and led to greater safety for factory workers, as well as sympathy for the union.


BUT BEFORE THAT. There was the Uprising of the 20,000. Which was damn great and almost unprecedented.





In the late 1800s and early 1900s, workers had begun to speak up more and more for their rights. These were mostly male workers, from the Knights of Labor to the AFL (American Federation of Labor), the latter headed by the inimitable Samuel Gompers:




Women were traditionally not a large part of the unions, if allowed in at all. They were seen as part-time workers who could be disregarded as their investment in their jobs would only last until they got married.


This assumption was a mistake.





Shirtwaists' popularity had blown up in the early 1900s. NO MORE were the one-piece dresses of your mother's day. Now it was all about the shirt and skirt combo of the future. Many of these shirtwaists were made in factories on the Lower East Side of New York City. The idea of an 8-hour work day was almost a joke, women were frequently sexually harassed or assaulted by their bosses or other male workers, there were almost no safety regulations, and they were (unsurprisingly) paid much less than their male counterparts.


A meeting was called at Cooper Union. Samuel Gompers spoke, as well as other male union leaders. All spoke of patience and negotiation, until Clara Lemlich, a young Jewish Ukrainian immigrant jumped on the stage and said:


"I have listened to all the speakers, and I have no further patience for talk. I am a working girl, one of those striking against intolerable conditions. I am tired of listening to speakers who talk in generalities. What we are here for is to decide whether or not to strike. I make a motion that we go out in a general strike."


And so the Uprising of the 20,000 began.


Women walked the picket line despite frequent beatings, arrest, freezing temperatures, and a rapidly diminishing strike fund. Smaller shops started giving into their demands, but larger companies (like Triangle) would not capitulate. They hired scabs, as well as thugs to attack the women in the streets. They paid off judges to put the women in rough jails when similar strikes by men had yielded no more than half a dozen arrests total.


One of the most remarkable things that came from the strike was the previously unheard-of support across class lines. 


While some of this support would later end due to friction, it remains a fact that a number of New York's upper upper class grande dames, such as the difficult Alva Belmont and J.P. Morgan's daughter Anne Morgan, contributed considerable time, resources, and support to the strike, while a parallel situation was not seen in men's strikes.



Alva Belmont (left)

The reasons for this are debatable. Sentiment makes one want to say it was the purity of sisterhood or some similar reason. It seems likely that it was most likely a combination of women's disenfranchised position, and their tendency to be raised to believe their place is to help others.


These upper class women were called "the Mink Brigade." Other cross-class groups/women to help in the Uprising included Mary Dreier, a New York social reformer whose arrest on the picket line would lead to increased public support, and the college girls. I love the college girls. Unlike women like Anne Morgan, they stayed until the bitter end.



This picture is clearly the best one because that one lady looks so fun

The college girls came because the union sent women workers like Pauline Newman and Rose Schneiderman (who later worked with FDR) on speaking tours around the Northeast. Girls from women's colleges like Vassar, Wellesley, and Bryn Mawr started showing up on the picket line. Bryn Mawr graduate and heiress Carola Woerishoffer bought houses, and "haunted the entrance to the Jefferson Market Court at Sixth Avenue and Tenth Street and whenever another group of arrested strikers was marched before a magistrate, she was with them in front of the bench armed with a deed, ready to slap it down for their release."


Vassar graduate and lawyer-in-training Inez Milholland, later known as a martyr to American women's suffrage (she collapsed and died due to complications from pernicious anemia while on a pro-suffrage speaking tour), was on hand to offer free legal advice. 


This attention and help changed the way the strikers saw themselves. The women who came to their aid made them feel like "not victims in need of pity, but fighters. . .It stiffened the spines of the shirtwaist strikers and made them proud of being exactly what they were -- workers, immigrants."





The strike came to an end on February 15, 1910, a little more than a year before the Triangle fire. Out of 353 companies, 339 agreed to most of the strikers' terms. The shirtwaist workers proved women could be a formidable force for the union. One of the companies not to capitulate was, of course, Triangle. When the fire occurred in 1911, it was said that the police who had been beating the women in the street the year before were now picking their bodies up from the sidewalk.


The strike not only gave these thousands of women a stronger sense of worth, but gave them the knowledge they could make a difference. Many became suffragists as a result of the strike, as they learned their voices were worth being heard. The Uprising of the 20,000 changed at least as many lives as participated in it.

Comments

  1. Thank you for your history lessons, they are APPRECIATED

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

My Cousin Rachel by Daphne Du Maurier: DID SHE OR DIDN'T SHE

Daphne Du Maurier's 1951 My Cousin Rachel prompts the age-old question: what if you were a young dumb dumb with an estate in Cornwall who is convinced your charming, thoughtful, and recently-widowed cousin Rachel wants to abandon her native Italy forever and live with you, your dogs, and your elderly butler in a damp house by the sea. AFTER ALL WHO WOULDN'T.

Also she's a widow because she'd married your uncle who raised you who then recently died, so also this has just become the MOST oedipal and makes everyone feel gross thinking about it.




Said dumb dumb is Philip Ashley, who is 24 and aptly referred to in the recent film version as a "glorious puppy." He is so excited about some things. And so sulky about so many other things. He's our narrator, which here means he is our misogynistic, xenophobic lens through which to view all events. His uncle died in Italy soon after marrying Rachel. Said uncle suspected he was being poisoned. He also probably had a bra…