Skip to main content

I have perhaps acquired too much information

Research is very near to my favorite thing to do. The best thing about it is how one thing leads you to another, then another, then suddenly you're five miles away, looking with a shaded hand at your starting point and going "Huh. That's neat."


And then there are links! Blessed, blessed links throughout life that lead back to something from ten years before and give you a new perspective on it.

When I was 14, I interviewed Rupert Holmes, writer of The PiƱa Colada Song and creator of the '90s AMC series Remember WENN, the latter of which is my favorite show of all time. He also, it turns out, wrote and composed the musical version of The Mystery of Edwin Drood, which I have of course gotten a bit into 13 years after that interview. Basically, Rupert Holmes is the greatest, and links over time are awesome.

Researching The Mystery of Edwin Drood and the possibly queer subtext contained therein (of which scholars have MUCH TO SAY, I do assure you) has led me down some delightful paths and into areas about which I knew almost nothing prior to a couple weeks ago.

I've emailed and gotten replies from two of the leading academics in their fields; I've started a biography of Nell Ternan, which has in turn acquainted me with the story of the mistress of William IV (Dora Jordan); I'm reading a series of essays about Edwin Drood from 1951 which has the BEST theory for Dick Datchery and which I got very skippy about yesterday; I read an article on Dickens and Wilkie, which gave a rather concise summing up of their friendship and its essential dissolution as well as the probable cause; Dr. Furneaux, author of Queer Dickens, referred me to Lillian Faderman, who in turn referred me to her anthology Chloe Plus Olivia, which I happened to already own (but had not read): this anthology I've only just begun, but already it's been extremely informative regarding early female authors/poets such as Katherine Philips and Geraldine Jewsbury.

me and anything related to my subject

Basically EVERYTHING IS EXCITING. And Lillian Faderman is brilliant and I'm pretty determined to read everything she's written. Obsessions are the best because they give you the energy to go off in all these directions, as anything related to the object of obsession now becomes interesting. Meanwhile, I've started reading W.M. Thackeray's Pendennis as a result of all this, which might be the weirdest of the offshoots, but it is already hilarious, so good job, Thackeray.

So DO NOT DESPAIR, OBSESSIVES. Sometimes our tendencies make us productive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop ( Odyssey Books , where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have. I feel like we could get to this point, Emily INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'. You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters. If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing: We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilar

Book Blogger Hop, Pt II

All right. The question for this week is:  "Do you read only one book at a time, or do you have several going at once?" Oh-ho my. I have an issue with book commitment. I start a new book, and it's exciting and fresh, and I get really jazzed about it, and then 20% of the way through, almost without fail, I start getting bored and want to start another book. I once had seven books going at the same time, because I kept getting bored and starting new ones. It's a sickness. Right now I'm being pretty good and working on The Monk , Northanger Abbey , Kissing the Witch , and I'm about to start Waiting for the Barbarians since my friend lent it to me. But The Monk and NA are basically books I only read when I'm at work, so I don't see it so much as working on four books, as having books in different locales. Yes. This entry wasn't as good as some of the others, but I shall rally on the morrow. Yes I shall.