Skip to main content

Movies are usually happier than books

In case you all were worried about the fate of the fast-walking couple that I usually see ahead of me on the walk to work, WORRY NO LONGER. I hadn't seen them in a few months, and I started worrying either they moved, one of them switched jobs, or the unthinkable happened and fate had torn them asunder. But NO. I took one of two routes this morning and ended up at our meetup point a bit earlier than normal and THERE they were, bundled up in winter clothes, but him with his Toby Stephens-handsome face and her with her hunching-forward-a-bit walk.

And yeah, I slowed down when we approached the corner where they say goodbye because I wanted to see if they'd still kiss in 1 degree weather. AND THEY DID. They better invite me to their wedding. If they're not already married. Because I am the biggest fan of their relationship.




My roommate and I saw Silver Linings Playbook yesterday, which was like a day after I finished the book. Which is usually not advisable, because then you're like "FALSE, because on page 143, he says he went to the grocery store and not 'the pet store.' WHY WOULD YOU CHANGE THAT?"

So. I get why people would maybe not be into the book if reading it after seeing the movie (lookin' at you, Alley). Because the movie makes the story a lot more palatable. Main example: the dad in the book is a piece of shit. He sucks. The dad in the movie is an ADORABLY ENDEARING Robert De Niro who isn't emotionally and physically distanced from his son. When he hugged him in their first scene, I was like "Wait -- what?" And then prepared myself to watch something different from what I'd read.

There's also something that's a big reveal in the book that they tell you in the first like 20 minutes of the movie. The focus seems to be on him and Tiffany, and towards the end it felt distinctively romcom-ish. Which is FINE, because I am all over those movies, but it's...differenty. From what I was expecting.

So yeah. If you've already seen the movie, mayyybe don't read the book? A lot of the characters aren't as likable. It's like if you watch the 1940s Wuthering Heights with Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon, and Cathy's brother is a DICK and takes Heathcliff's horse, and you're like "What an asshole. I certainly do feel sorry for this Heathcliff character," but then in the book you're like "WAIT HERE HEATHCLIFF TAKES THE HORSE. HE'S THE ASSHOLE."

Hollywood: Makin' Your Book More Palatable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop ( Odyssey Books , where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have. I feel like we could get to this point, Emily INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'. You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters. If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing: We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilar

Book Blogger Hop, Pt II

All right. The question for this week is:  "Do you read only one book at a time, or do you have several going at once?" Oh-ho my. I have an issue with book commitment. I start a new book, and it's exciting and fresh, and I get really jazzed about it, and then 20% of the way through, almost without fail, I start getting bored and want to start another book. I once had seven books going at the same time, because I kept getting bored and starting new ones. It's a sickness. Right now I'm being pretty good and working on The Monk , Northanger Abbey , Kissing the Witch , and I'm about to start Waiting for the Barbarians since my friend lent it to me. But The Monk and NA are basically books I only read when I'm at work, so I don't see it so much as working on four books, as having books in different locales. Yes. This entry wasn't as good as some of the others, but I shall rally on the morrow. Yes I shall.