Skip to main content

If Authors Got Married Solely for My Amusement

Do you ever think how hilarious it would be if certain authors were married to other authors? Like how pissed off they'd be at each other and like 'WHY DID I EVEN MARRY YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE WE LIVE IN DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS.' I think I'd super-enjoy having Nathaniel Hawthorne married to Dorothy Parker, because I love both of them, but Hawthorne has said some shit about ladies. Mainly that female authors were a "damned mob of scribbling women" and that they should be "forbidden to write, on pain of having their faces deeply scarified with an oyster-shell."

damn, sir.

But would Dorothy Parker put up with that shit? Hellllllll no. She'd write some withering but hilarious op-ed from the POV of a man saying women cannot write and Hawthorne would read it and be like "STOP MAKING FUN OF ME RIGHT NOW DOROTHEA" and she'd be like "Stop calling me Dorothea right now or so help me God" and he'd be like "YOU NEVER DARN MY WAISTCOATS" and then she would throw a martini on his chrysanthemums and he'd be like "THOSE ARE DELICATE WHAT ARE YOU DOING OMG."

It's something I want to see, s'all I'm saying.

I also want Jane Austen married to Rachel Maddow, but that's less a literary marriage and more a "SHE'S super-conservative and lives in the 19th century. SHE'S captain of the liberals and lives in 2014. How will these two crazy kids make it work." People today keep ignoring the fact that Austen was totally a conservative and it is irritating. Remember how in Emma, after Emma marries Mr Knightley and Harriet marries that farmer guy, the narrator's like "And then they basically totally stopped hanging out, as well they should, because gross, farmers." She never says "And then the poor woman from the lower class married the baronet." No! Elizabeth says "He is a gentleman; I am a gentleman's daughter; so far we are equal." Because they're of the same class. The only thing Austen rebels against is financial status determining marriages. If you're knighted but you're poor, you should still totally get to marry your daughter to someone else in the gentry class. Who else is she supposed to marry? The aforementioned farmer?

Maddow would continually bang her head against a wall because of Austen's opinions, but then Austen would write something really funny and they'd be ok again for like a day. 


they could make it.

Doug has weighed in on this and says: "'Are we gonna be Maddow-Austen or Austen-Maddow?' Actually Austen-Maddow sounds better." So he is INVESTED. He also thinks they would both hate each other, because if you will remember, Doug has read Pride and Prejudice.

If you think of any better pairings, let me know, because it is 9 in the damn morning and my brain has decided it's done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop ( Odyssey Books , where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have. I feel like we could get to this point, Emily INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'. You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters. If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing: We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilar

Book Blogger Hop, Pt II

All right. The question for this week is:  "Do you read only one book at a time, or do you have several going at once?" Oh-ho my. I have an issue with book commitment. I start a new book, and it's exciting and fresh, and I get really jazzed about it, and then 20% of the way through, almost without fail, I start getting bored and want to start another book. I once had seven books going at the same time, because I kept getting bored and starting new ones. It's a sickness. Right now I'm being pretty good and working on The Monk , Northanger Abbey , Kissing the Witch , and I'm about to start Waiting for the Barbarians since my friend lent it to me. But The Monk and NA are basically books I only read when I'm at work, so I don't see it so much as working on four books, as having books in different locales. Yes. This entry wasn't as good as some of the others, but I shall rally on the morrow. Yes I shall.