Skip to main content

Stalled reading plus shipping and do we know what that is?

People seem to be in a reading rut right now (I cite Meg's post "Reading Rut, I am in you"), and I am the biggest no-exception. I've started a truly extraordinary number of books and finished none. And then I had that whole watch-too-many-episodes-of-that-unnamed-show thing. 

SO. Just to explain why this hasn't been too updatey. But I'm sure you all have just been in a veritable WHIRLWIND of holiday activity, and are barely even reading blogs, so I could really post or not post whatever and it would all just zoom down into the blogging void. I don't need to explain what the blogging void is, because this is already in it and NO CAN READ THINGS THERE.

...my tumblr's been like this lately as well.

here're some puppies

If I can go in a fiction-related but not necessarily solely book-related direction, do we all know what shipping is?

When I use this


do you all think I'm talking about an actual boat? Hopefully not. Okay, so "shipping" is short for "relationshipping" which means you want certain people to end up together in a romantic way. The term was originally used for Mulder and Scully; people who wanted them to end up together were called Relationshippers (as opposed to the No-Romos).

Do you feel like it's ok to ship non-canon things? Our generally liberal societal feeling makes me think the kneejerk response for a non-guilty conscience would be "Sure, people can do whatever they want," but shipping non-canon couples can make people VERY VERY ANGRY. Like "There is no EVIDENCE; why would you DO that." I'm going to assume most of the people feeling this way are 12, because that's what I did when I was 12.

But you've got authorial intent, right? The author puts two people together. Like Ron and Hermione in Harry Potter. But then you've got all these Harry/Hermione shippers who are like "I don't know what book YOU'RE reading, but H/Hr forever, yo." And J.K's like "That's...kind of delusional." And then the internet EXPLODES.

I should note that JKR specifically avoided saying they were delusional, because she didn't want the internet to explode, but it did anyway, because she shot H/Hr down. So. I guess we're looking at shipping rights. 1) Can you ship non-canon? (pretty much definitely yes) 2) Are you allowed to badger the author for validation? Well. That seems odd since it's not canon, i.e. not what the author chose to do, but I've done exactly that with Once Upon a Time and Swan Queen, the Emma Swan/Evil Queen pairing. 

oh sure, I'M the crazy one

I don't know. I guess people should suck it up if it's a book and it's done and the author obviously put people with someone other than you wanted, but since I've been a part of the shipping world for 14 years, I've kind of got a huge amount of sympathy with people and their ships. And if you can get an author to say "Well, it didn't end up that way, but sure, there was that potential," then that is awesome

If a work of fiction is 'out there' can people do what they want with it/interpret it how they want? Can you tell an author "I'm sorry, but the way you've written it clearly indicates these two characters love each other," and have validation for that EVEN if the author says "OMG NO STOP IT"?

I'm particularly interested in this BECAUSE of Swan Queen. There are basically a hundred good arguments for it, but the likelihood of it actually happening is close to zero (which is crazy-stupid, btw). People have pretty much said "I know what I've seen and I refuse to put Emma with whichever Guy of the Week She Has No Chemistry With that you try to force in." Sigh. Oh, fiction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

Yes, Frances Willard was as gay as Oscar Wilde. But in a lady-way.

Yup. We're gonna do it. We're gonna talk about Frances Willard and gayness. Look, it's not a major part of her life, and it's definitely not the main thing she should be remembered for, but the fact that a line is being put out that she was totally straight is complete hogwash and it upsets me.




The thing is, I get when people say it's anachronistic to put the cultural concept of "gayness" onto a person from a century other than the 20th/21st. I get that. And usually agree with it. But Frances Willard is one of the gayest people in history. I have zero problem labeling her with that. The fact that she didn't have the language to describe what she was experiencing is upsetting, but she managed to have a seemingly full and satisfying life anyway, so I am happy for her.

And for people annoyed when gay people say that someone from the past was gay, here's the thing: When you're completely whitewashed from history, it is a matter of TOTAL DELIGHT wh…