Skip to main content

A doorway!

I have found a meme that seems to be a doorway to truly awesome blogs, for which I am extremely thankful. It is this:





Literary Blog Hop



Do you find yourself predisposed to like (or dislike) books that are generally accepted as great books and have been incorporated into the literary canon? Discuss the effect you believe a book’s “status” has on your opinion of it.


I’m definitely predisposed to like them, and I’ll tell you why, meme. It’s because every century churns out an almost infinite amount of crap literature, and then a tiny bit of good. Undoubtedly, some of the good stuff gets left out of the canon, and some of the bad stuff inexplicably worms its way in, but overall if something is canon I tend to assume it’s there because it’s timeless (er, to a certain degree) and has a piece of human truth in it. This has led to me reading the amazingness that is Middlemarch, and the death knell that is Romola (really, George Eliot? really?). It led to Ethan Frome, which made me sob at 2 in the morning for the fates of its characters, and Summer, which just flat-out sucks.


As I discussed in a previous post on contemporary lit, my reliance on canon lit crippled me to a certain extent for some years, as I did not trust any novels that did not have a 100-year-old stamp of approval. Fortunately, that has changed, but I do look with much more suspicion upon modern works than I do upon, say, anything written by Thackeray. No, that’s actually not true. I distrust anything by Thackeray that isn’t Vanity Fair. So let’s say anything written by Dickens, trite as that may be.


Hurrah for canon!

Comments

  1. I agree with you...except for the part about Middlemarch, because (horrors!) I haven't read it. YET.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @chambanachik I had a professor yell at me to read Middlemarch (well, 'politely suggest to') and I loved Dorothea Brooke sooooo much. She might be my favorite heroine ever. Mebbe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are funny and I'm honored to be a new follower. Tell me: are you contralto, alto, mezzo or soprano?

    ReplyDelete
  4. @As the Crowe Flies and Reads Hurray! And I'm following you! Resulting in us going in an endless circle.

    Soprano, unfortunately. So...so unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, but what about those works that are left out? Why are they left out? Who makes the canon?
    I'm not saying that I don't trust works from the canon, but I don't always trust the criteria that have been picked to choose those books.
    Furthermore, like with everything, there is also a matter of taste.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your blog cracks me up! I'm definitely a new follower. I'm glad you found our Hop! :)

    -Ingrid from The Blue Bookcase

    ReplyDelete
  7. @IngridLola You do complit?? That was my major! I did 19th c. British/French lit and it was awesome and it's the best field to be in. Of ever, if you will.

    ReplyDelete
  8. My path was slightly different as I read a lot these classics without realising they had status. But I think all that status can do is act as a guide, signposting a way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Great post and welcome to the hop. There's a lot of truth to this. I was reading Pride and Prejudice with my teenage daughter- a girl who reads constantly. We were about 2/3 through it and she said, "Mom, old books really are better." I pointed out in my wise old mom way that not all old books are better, only the ones that have stood the test of time and she rolled her eyes at me because she knew that, but there is a reason the classics are classics. We might not like them all, but they are good books.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Julie That took me a minute, but yes...yes.

    I'll edit it, but no more critiquing my new friends from you, madam. :P Also, bring your scarf and scotch tape today.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Of course, I agree with you. The canon is a great place to start when looking for books that are probably not suck-tastic. I do think, however, that the canon deserves re-examination by readers on a constant basis. Because sometimes, the literary critics and academics that developed the canon over time were smoking something crackalicious.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I share your suspicion of modern literature. The literary canon should not be a crutch, but it remains a source of works that transcend time and culture to provide us with wisdom.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'.


You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters.

If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing:


We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilarious/awesome que…

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop (Odyssey Books, where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have.


INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy the Pleistocene era of megafauna and drinking Shirley Templ…

My Cousin Rachel by Daphne Du Maurier: DID SHE OR DIDN'T SHE

Daphne Du Maurier's 1951 My Cousin Rachel prompts the age-old question: what if you were a young dumb dumb with an estate in Cornwall who is convinced your charming, thoughtful, and recently-widowed cousin Rachel wants to abandon her native Italy forever and live with you, your dogs, and your elderly butler in a damp house by the sea. AFTER ALL WHO WOULDN'T.

Also she's a widow because she'd married your uncle who raised you who then recently died, so also this has just become the MOST oedipal and makes everyone feel gross thinking about it.




Said dumb dumb is Philip Ashley, who is 24 and aptly referred to in the recent film version as a "glorious puppy." He is so excited about some things. And so sulky about so many other things. He's our narrator, which here means he is our misogynistic, xenophobic lens through which to view all events. His uncle died in Italy soon after marrying Rachel. Said uncle suspected he was being poisoned. He also probably had a bra…