Skip to main content

Austrian Noodles + Cultural Doxa in Relationships

PHEW. Labor Day, amirite? So much, you guys. I made Doug of Wuthering Heights fame and Katie from A Writer Must Record the Times watch Blazing Saddles because THEY NEVER HAD BEFORE, only Doug showed up already kind of wasted, so he watched most of it while hanging upside down off the side of my couch. And a good time was had by all. Then Julie from Contractually Obligated to Like Books said we should go to Julius Meinl, and I HAD NEVER BEEN, so we did that and I ate all the Austrian food.

No, seriously, you guys. This was the best:

And then Doctor Who happened and I MADE A VID about one of the characters. You know the one I mean. SoufflĂ© girl. THEN there was the White Sox game (for those of you not in Chicago, the Sox are our actually good team) where I had ice cream nachos. Then I bothered everyone on twitter. OH, what a weekend.

I was reading a book called Straight: The Surprisingly Short History of Heterosexuality that I'm going to review later, because I need to think about it, but part of it discusses how the central focus in marriages and relationships has shifted. Meaning it used to be basically a business partnership, because you were way too busy making sure your goats didn't die to worry whether you were feeling as satisfied as you possibly could be with your partner. 

But then we got this whole romantic love thing, and everyone for a while was all "SOULMATES HOW WILL I FIND MY SOULMATE" and then people started making fun of that because HAH, soulmates, but were still all "I super-want someone I can fall in love with" (which the author says seems to be a cultural construct, by the way), and that's kind of where we are now. But whereas before we used to be very concerned indeed about finding someone we might feel less than passionately about, but who would be good for the long haul, now it seems to be more "Well, yeah, do they make enough money and are they stable, but MORE IMPORTANTLY, how do they feel about this band I like?"

I guess, is this shift bad? If we try to divorce ourselves from our current cultural doxa (a word she uses many times in the book, and which means a culture's common belief that is so ingrained that everyone 'just knows that's how it is'), despite everyone "knowing" it's important to be in love with the person you're with for the rest of your life, has that served us better? Are we happier as a people because of it? I guess it's difficult to tell since we can't interview any 13th century couples, but damn is our divorce rate high.

Maybe more interestingly, how are our views of relationships shifting now? They've undergone huge changes, probably bigger than in any other time period, in the last hundred years. Interracial marriage has become pretty normalized, gay marriage is becoming more acceptable, and people are becoming less fearful of subgroups like the transgender community. We now have much less of a concrete, black and white definition of what makes a relationship. Which in my opinion is good, because we don't live in a clear-cut, black and white world, and our understanding needs to reflect that.


Popular posts from this blog

How to Build a Girl Introductory Post, which is full of wonderful things you probably want to read

Acclaimed (in England mostly) lady Caitlin Moran has a novel coming out. A NOVEL. Where before she has primarily stuck to essays. Curious as we obviously were about this, I and a group of bloggers are having a READALONG of said novel, probably rife with spoilers (maybe they don't really matter for this book, though, so you should totally still read my posts). This is all hosted/cared for/lovingly nursed to health by Emily at As the Crowe Flies (and Reads) because she has a lovely fancy job at an actual bookshop ( Odyssey Books , where you can in fact pre-order this book and then feel delightful about yourself for helping an independent store). Emily and I have negotiated the wonders of Sri Lankan cuisine and wandered the Javits Center together. Would that I could drink with her more often than I have. I feel like we could get to this point, Emily INTRODUCTION-wise (I might've tipped back a little something this evening, thus the constant asides), I am Alice. I enjoy

Harry Potter 2013 Readalong Signup Post of Amazingness and Jollity

Okay, people. Here it is. Where you sign up to read the entire Harry Potter series (or to reminisce fondly), starting January 2013, assuming we all survive the Mayan apocalypse. I don't think I'm even going to get to Tina and Bette's reunion on The L Word until after Christmas, so here's hopin'. You guys know how this works. Sign up if you want to. If you're new to the blog, know that we are mostly not going to take this seriously. And when we do take it seriously, it's going to be all Monty Python quotes when we disagree on something like the other person's opinion on Draco Malfoy. So be prepared for your parents being likened to hamsters. If you want to write lengthy, heartfelt essays, that is SWELL. But this is maybe not the readalong for you. It's gonna be more posts with this sort of thing: We're starting Sorceror's/Philosopher's Stone January 4th. Posts will be on Fridays. The first post will be some sort of hilar

#24in48: What Was Good, What Was Bad, What You Should Read

24in48, where we try to read for 24 hours out of 48, has come and gone once more. I managed 13 hours, which considering my usual average is 2, is excellent and I will take it. I attribute this to genuine planning this time and a remarkable lack of things to do that weekend. What did I finish! The Witches: Salem, 1692  by Stacy Schiff Captain Phasma  by Kelly Thompson (comic) The Daughter of Time  by Josephine Tey DC Bombshells  Volume 1 (comic) The Punisher: The Complete Collection, Volume 1 (comic) Mars Evacuees  by Sophia McDougall The Good. It was actually all pretty good, so I'm gonna give a quick recap so you can decide if it strikes your fancy or not. The Summaries The Witches: Salem, 1692. This is a breakdown of everything that happened before, during, and after the Salem witch trials of 1692. I loved the beginning because Stacy Schiff gives you a good idea of the awfulness of life in New England in the 17th century, and it also helps you understand ho